Exceeds AI
Prove AI is improving engineering output and code quality
Exceeds AI analyzes commit-level activity to show how AI affects adoption, quality, and ROI across your engineering team. It helps leaders see where AI is working, where rework is rising, and what to do next.
Agenticness = how independently a tool can take action, scored across 9 dimensions. Scored independently by David Kooi, Skylark Creations — see full rubric →
Is this your tool? Claim this listing to manage your content and analytics.
What's happened with Exceeds AI lately
- Score changetriggered by newsAgenticness score 5 → 6 ↑5 → 6/36(+1)
Score re-evaluated after: Why are coders reaching for Z.ai's GLM 5.2 before frontier models on some coding tasks?
See the news that prompted this - Why are coders reaching for Z.ai's GLM 5.2 before frontier models on some coding tasks?News
Z.ai's GLM 5.2 has narrowed the gap with U.S. rivals on several coding benchmarks. Zain Hasan of Together AI says he now sends harder problems to frontier models and simpler ones to cheaper tools. For those tracking AI coding assistants, this signals that model choice is becoming a cost and task match, not just a quality race. The twist is that GLM 5.2 is good enough for work once reserved for pricier systems, but not across every coding job.
via IEEE Spectrum: Technology, Engineering, and Science News
- Score changeRubric upgrade v3_0 → v3.1: score 7/32 → 5/367 → 5/36(-2)
Rubric upgrade: agenticness v3.0 (8 dims, /32) → v3.1 (9 dims, /36). Adds Dim 9 (Operator Sovereignty), splits Dim 6 into 6a/6b lenses, tightens Dim 4 autonomous-retry distinction. Not a product change — score shift reflects new dimension + recalibrated rubric, not a change in the tool. Fanout suppressed.
See the news that prompted this
News mentions sourced from our news feed; score changes from periodic re-evaluations.
Ask about Exceeds AI
Get answers based on Exceeds AI's actual documentation
Try asking:
About
Exceeds AI is an engineering analytics platform focused on measuring the impact of AI use in software teams. It sits closer to code intelligence and team reporting than to a coding assistant: the product analyzes commits, repositories, and related...
The product appears strongest as an analytics and reporting layer for teams already using AI in development. It surfaces dashboards, per-engineer profiles, and advisor-style recommendations grounded in commit and ticketing data. That makes it useful...
Executes tasks you assign, one step at a time, within narrow domains.
Dimension Breakdown
Categories
Ask about Exceeds AI
Try asking:
- Free: 30-day Pilot plan; 1 seat, up to 10 contributors analyzed, 1 repository, standard dashboards, GitHub/GitLab integrations, Entra and Google Workspace access, and 10 AI insight credits per month.
- Pro ($49/manager/month): Early Partner Pricing; 50 seats, unlimited* contributors and repositories, expanded dashboards, GitHub/GitLab integrations, Entra and Google Workspace access, 50 AI insight credits per seat per month, and optional Jira/Linear integration add-on.
- Enterprise: Contact sales; custom seats, unlimited* contributors and repositories, standard and advanced ROI/team dashboards, GitHub/GitLab/Linear/Jira/Google Drive/HRIS integrations, Entra/Google Workspace/Okta/SSO access, AI insight credits included with BYOK, and dedicated support.
*Fair use limits noted on the site for the paid tiers.
Related Tools
Get the weekly agentic AI briefing
New tools, top picks, and trends — delivered every Thursday.